Citizens for Amending Proposition v. City of Pomona

Full Case Name
CITIZENS FOR AMENDING PROPOSITION L et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CITY OF POMONA, Defendant and Appellant.
Description

The Court affirmed the trial court's ruling that the city of Pomona's agreeement with Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. was a new agreement that violated a duty to comply with Proposition L, a ballot initiative that passed which prohibited the construction of additional billboards within Pomona city limits.

Date
11-07-2018
Court
Court of Appeal, Fifth District, California
Jurisdiction
California
Defendants
Incident Location
Pomona, CA
Disputed Act

Proposition L was a ballot initiative that passed which prohibited the construction of additional billboards within Pomona city limits. Plaintiff, a non-profit composed of Pomona city residents formed to advocate for the enforcement of Proposition L, brought suit against the city of Pomona for entering into an extended agreement with Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Regency) to allow Regency to erect advertising billboards alongside several Pomona freeways. Issues discussed at city council meetings regarding the extended agreement with Regency included "the locations of billboards in the City, types of digital signs, light emissions, and the possibility of negotiating the removal of the three additional signs."

Holding
The Court affirmed the trial court's rulings that plaintiffs had standing, that the city of Pomona's agreeement with Regency Outdoor Advertising, Inc. was a new agreement that violated a duty to comply with Proposition L, and that plaintiffs were entitled to attorney's fees.
Disposition